Late life-threatening arrhythmia in patients with Brugada syndrome: Results from long-term follow-up in a large Japanese cohort.

INTRODUCTION: Most patients with Brugada syndrome (BrS) are first diagnosed in their 40s, with sudden cardiac death (SCD) often occurring in their 50s. Ventricular fibrillation (VF) may occur in some patients with BrS despite having been asymptomatic for a long period. This study aimed to assess the incidence and risk factors for late life-threatening arrhythmias in patients with BrS. METHODS: Patients with BrS (n = 523; mean age, 51 ± 13 years; male, n = 497) were enrolled. The risk of late life-threatening arrhythmia was investigated in 225 patients who had experienced no cardiac events (CEs: SCD or ventricular tachyarrhythmia) for at least 10 years after study enrollment. The incidence of CEs during the follow-up period was examined. RESULTS: During the follow-up of the 523 patients, 59 (11%) experienced CEs. The annual incidences of CEs were 2.87%, 0.77%, and 0.09% from study enrollment to 3, 3-10, and after 10 years, respectively. Among 225 patients who had experienced no CEs for at least 10 years after enrollment, four patients (1.8%) subsequently experienced CEs. Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed significant differences in the incidence of late CEs between patients with and without a history of symptoms (p = .032). The positive and negative predictive values of late CEs for the programmed electrical stimulation (PES) test were 2.9% and 100%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that patients with BrS who are asymptomatic and have no ventricular tachycardia/VF inducibility by PES are at extremely low risk of experiencing late life-threatening arrhythmias.

QRS Morphology and the Risk of Ventricular Tachyarrhythmia in Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Recipients.

BACKGROUND: There are conflicting data on the effect of cardiac resynchronization therapy with a defibrillator (CRT-D) on the risk of life-threatening ventricular tachyarrhythmia in heart failure patients. OBJECTIVES: The authors aimed to assess whether QRS morphology is associated with risk of ventricular arrhythmias in CRT recipients. METHODS: The study population comprised 2,862 patients implanted with implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD)/CRT-D for primary prevention who were enrolled in 5 landmark primary prevention ICD trials (MADIT-II [Multicenter Automated Defibrillator Implantation Trial], MADIT-CRT [Multicenter Automated Defibrillator Implantation Trial-Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy], MADIT-RIT [Multicenter Automated Defibrillator Implantation Trial-Reduction in Inappropriate Therapy], MADIT-RISK [Multicenter Automated Defibrillator Implantation Trial-RISK], and RAID [Ranolazine in High-Risk Patients With Implanted Cardioverter Defibrillators]). Patients with QRS duration ≥130 ms were divided into 2 groups: those implanted with an ICD only vs CRT-D. The primary endpoint was fast ventricular tachycardia (VT)/ventricular fibrillation (VF) (defined as VT ≥200 beats/min or VF), accounting for the competing risk of death. Secondary endpoints included appropriate shocks, any sustained VT or VF, and the burden of fast VT/VF, assessed in a recurrent event analysis. RESULTS: Among patients with left bundle branch block (n = 1,792), those with CRT-D (n = 1,112) experienced a significant 44% (P < 0.001) reduction in the risk of fast VT/VF compared with ICD-only patients (n = 680), a significantly lower burden of fast VT/VF (HR: 0.55; P = 0.001), with a reduced burden of appropriate shocks (HR: 0.44; P < 0.001). In contrast, among patients with non-left bundle branch block (NLBBB) (N = 1,070), CRT-D was not associated with reduction in fast VT/VF (HR: 1.33; P = 0.195). Furthermore, NLBBB patients with CRT-D experienced a statistically significant increase in the burden of fast VT/VF events compared with ICD-only patients (HR: 1.90; P = 0.013). CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest a potential proarrhythmic effect of CRT among patients with NLBBB. These data should be considered in patient selection for treatment with CRT.

Arrhythmic Risk in Biventricular Pacing Compared With Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing: Results From the I-CLAS Study.

BACKGROUND: Left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) may be associated with greater improvement in left ventricular ejection fraction and reduction in death or heart failure hospitalization compared with biventricular pacing (BVP) in patients requiring cardiac resynchronization therapy. We sought to compare the occurrence of sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT) or ventricular fibrillation (VF) and new-onset atrial fibrillation (AF) in patients undergoing BVP and LBBAP. METHODS: The I-CLAS study (International Collaborative LBBAP Study) included patients with left ventricular ejection fraction ≤35% who underwent BVP or LBBAP for cardiac resynchronization therapy between January 2018 and June 2022 at 15 centers. We performed propensity score-matched analysis of LBBAP and BVP in a 1:1 ratio. We assessed the incidence of VT/VF and new-onset AF among patients with no history of AF. Time to sustained VT/VF and time to new-onset AF was analyzed using the Cox proportional hazards survival model. RESULTS: Among 1778 patients undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy (BVP, 981; LBBAP, 797), there were 1414 propensity score-matched patients (propensity score-matched BVP, 707; propensity score-matched LBBAP, 707). The occurrence of VT/VF was significantly lower with LBBAP compared with BVP (4.2% versus 9.3%; hazard ratio, 0.46 [95% CI, 0.29-0.74]; P<0.001). The incidence of VT storm (>3 episodes in 24 hours) was also significantly lower with LBBAP compared with BVP (0.8% versus 2.5%; P=0.013). Among 299 patients with cardiac resynchronization therapy pacemakers (BVP, 111; LBBAP, 188), VT/VF occurred in 8 patients in the BVP group versus none in the LBBAP group (7.2% versus 0%; P<0.001). In 1194 patients with no history of VT/VF or antiarrhythmic therapy (BVP, 591; LBBAP, 603), the occurrence of VT/VF was significantly lower with LBBAP than with BVP (3.2% versus 7.3%; hazard ratio, 0.46 [95% CI, 0.26-0.81]; P=0.007). Among patients with no history of AF (n=890), the occurrence of new-onset AF >30 s was significantly lower with LBBAP than with BVP (2.8% versus 6.6%; hazard ratio, 0.34 [95% CI, 0.16-0.73]; P=0.008). The incidence of AF lasting >24 hours was also significantly lower with LBBAP than with BVP (0.7% versus 2.9%; P=0.015). CONCLUSIONS: LBBAP was associated with a lower incidence of sustained VT/VF and new-onset AF compared with BVP. This difference remained significant after adjustment for differences in baseline characteristics between patients with BVP and LBBAP. Physiological resynchronization by LBBAP may be associated with lower risk of arrhythmias compared with BVP.

Ventricular fibrillation/ventricular tachycardia within 72 h of VA-ECMO: incidence, outcomes, risk factors, and management.

AIMS: Veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) is an important technique for the treatment of refractory cardiogenic shock and cardiac arrest; however, the early management of ventricular fibrillation/ventricular tachycardia (VF/VT), within 72 h of VA-ECMO, and its effects on patient prognosis remain unclear. METHODS AND RESULTS: We retrospectively analysed patients at the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University who underwent VA-ECMO between January 2017 and March 2022. The patients were divided into two groups, VF/VT and nVF/VT, based on whether or not VF/VT occurred within 72 h after the initiation of VA-ECMO. We utilized logistic regression analysis to evaluate the independent risk factors for VF/VT in patients undergoing VA-ECMO and to ascertain whether the onset of VF/VT affected 28 day survival rate, length of intensive care unit stay, and/or other clinical prognostic factors. Subgroup analysis was performed for the VF/VT group to determine whether defibrillation affected prognosis. In the present study, 126 patients were included, 65.87% of whom were males (83/126), with a mean age of 46.89 ± 16.23, a 28 day survival rate of 57.14% (72/126), an incidence rate of VF/VT within 72 h of VA-ECMO initiation of 27.78% (35/126), and 80% of whom (28/35) received extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation. The incidence of VF/VT resulting from cardiac arrest at an early stage was significantly higher than that of refractory cardiogenic shock (80% vs. 20%; P = 0.022). The restricted cubic spline model revealed a U-shaped relationship between VF/VT incidence and initial heart rate (iHR), and multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that an iHR > 120 b.p.m. [odds ratio (OR) 6.117; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.672-22.376; P = 0.006] and hyperlactataemia (OR 1.125; 95% CI 1.016-1.246; P = 0.023) within 1 h of VA-ECMO initiation were independent risk factors for the occurrence of VF/VT. VF/VT was not found to be associated with the 28 day survival of patients undergoing VA-ECMO support, nor did it affect other secondary endpoints. Defibrillation did not alter the overall prognosis in patients with VF/VT during VA-ECMO. CONCLUSIONS: An iHR > 120 b.p.m. and hyperlactataemia were independent risk factors for the occurrence of VF/VT within 72 h of VA-ECMO initiation. The occurrence of VF/VT does not affect, nor does defibrillation in these patients improve the overall patient prognosis. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ChiCTR1900026105.

The genetic basis of apparently idiopathic ventricular fibrillation: a retrospective overview.

AIMS: During the diagnostic work-up of patients with idiopathic ventricular fibrillation (VF), next-generation sequencing panels can be considered to identify genotypes associated with arrhythmias. However, consensus for gene panel testing is still lacking, and variants of uncertain significance (VUS) are often identified. The aim of this study was to evaluate genetic testing and its results in idiopathic VF patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: We investigated 419 patients with available medical records from the Dutch Idiopathic VF Registry. Genetic testing was performed in 379 (91%) patients [median age at event 39 years (27-51), 60% male]. Single-gene testing was performed in 87 patients (23%) and was initiated more often in patients with idiopathic VF before 2010. Panel testing was performed in 292 patients (77%). The majority of causal (likely) pathogenic variants (LP/P, n = 56, 15%) entailed the DPP6 risk haplotype (n = 39, 70%). Moreover, 10 LP/P variants were found in cardiomyopathy genes (FLNC, MYL2, MYH7, PLN (two), TTN (four), RBM20), and 7 LP/P variants were identified in genes associated with cardiac arrhythmias (KCNQ1, SCN5A (2), RYR2 (four)). For eight patients (2%), identification of an LP/P variant resulted in a change of diagnosis. In 113 patients (30%), a VUS was identified. Broad panel testing resulted in a higher incidence of VUS in comparison to single-gene testing (38% vs. 3%, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Almost all patients from the registry underwent, albeit not broad, genetic testing. The genetic yield of causal LP/P variants in idiopathic VF patients is 5%, increasing to 15% when including DPP6. In specific cases, the LP/P variant is the underlying diagnosis. A gene panel specifically for idiopathic VF patients is proposed.

Outcomes of Patients With Takotsubo Syndrome Compared With Type 1 and Type 2 Myocardial Infarction.

Background Takotsubo syndrome (TS) and myocardial infarction (MI) share similar clinical and laboratory characteristics but have important differences in causes, demographics, management, and outcomes. Methods and Results In this observational study, the National Inpatient Sample and National Readmission Database were used to identify patients admitted with TS, type 1 MI, or type 2 MI in the United States between October 1, 2017, and December 31, 2019. We compared patients hospitalized with TS, type 1 MI, and type 2 MI with respect to key features and outcomes. Over the 27-month study period, 2 035 055 patients with type 1 MI, 639 075 patients with type 2 MI, and 43 335 patients with TS were identified. Cardiac arrest, ventricular fibrillation, and ventricular tachycardia were more prevalent in type 1 MI (4.02%, 3.2%, and 7.2%, respectively) compared with both type 2 MI (2.8%, 0.8%, and 5.4% respectively) and TS (2.7%, 1.8%, and 5.3%, respectively). Risk of mortality was lower in TS compared with both type 1 MI (3.3% versus 7.9%; adjusted odds ratio [OR], 0.3; P<0.001) and type 2 MI (3.3% versus 8.2%; adjusted OR, 0.3; P<0.001). Mortality rate (OR, 1.2; P<0.001) and cardiac-cause 30-day readmission rate (adjusted OR, 1.7; P<0.001) were higher in type 1 MI than in type 2 MI. Conclusions Patients with type 1 MI had the highest rates of in-hospital mortality and cardiac-cause 30-day readmission. Risk of all-cause 30-day readmission was highest in patients with type 2 MI. The risk of ventricular arrhythmias in patients with TS is lower than in patients with type 1 MI but higher than in patients with type 2 MI.

Ventricular Parasystole in Cardiomyopathy Patients: A Link Between His-Purkinje System Damage and Ventricular Fibrillation.

BACKGROUND: The clinical relevance and prognostic implications of ventricular parasystole are unknown. OBJECTIVES: This study sought to assess the prevalence of ventricular parasystole in patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) and ventricular parasystole's association with ventricular arrhythmias and conduction system abnormalities. METHODS: This study retrospectively evaluated patients who underwent ICD interrogation at a single center between June 1, 2019, and August 31, 2020, and reviewed all available ICD and electrocardiogram data. This study identified patients with ventricular parasystole and compared the prevalence of ventricular fibrillation (VF), ventricular tachycardia (VT), and new conduction system abnormalities in those with ≥5 years of intrinsic QRS-complex electrocardiograms to those without parasystole. RESULTS: This study included 374 patients (age 57 ± 21 years, 72% male, 45% nonischemic, 32% ischemic cardiomyopathy), of which, 104 (28%) had VT only, 39 (10%) VF only, and 10 (3%) both VT/VF. Ventricular parasystole was identified in 33 patients (9%); parasystolic foci were predominantly from the His-Purkinje system. Compared with those without parasystole, patients with parasystole had a significantly higher rate of VF (36% vs 11%; P < 0.01), but not VT (42% vs 29%; P = 0.12). Patients with parasystole, compared with those without parasystole, had a higher prevalence of new conduction abnormalities, particularly progressive intraventricular conduction delay (11 of 18 [61%] vs 12 of 83 [14%]; P < 0.01) and new right bundle branch block (4 of 18 [22%] vs 1 of 83 [1%]; P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Ventricular parasystole was strongly associated with new conduction system abnormalities and VF in patients who have cardiomyopathy with ICDs, suggesting a potential link between VF and His-Purkinje damage in this patient population.

Ventricular arrhythmias in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: Prevalence, distribution, predictors, and outcome.

BACKGROUND: Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) carries an increased risk of sudden cardiac death. Ventricular fibrillation (VF) is thought to be the common culprit arrhythmia. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to describe the incidence and predictors of sustained ventricular arrhythmias (VTAs) in HCM patients. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed all patients with HCM and an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) from a prospectively derived registry in 2 tertiary medical centers. Clinical, electrocardiographic, echocardiographic, ICD interrogation, and genetic data were collected and compared, first between patients with and without VTAs and then between patients with only VF and those with ventricular tachycardia (VT) with or without VF. RESULTS: Of the 1328 HCM patients, 207 (145 [70%] male; mean age 33 ± 16 years) were implanted with ICDs. Over a mean follow-up of 10 ± 6 years, 37 patients with ICDs (18%) developed sustained VTAs. These were associated with a family history of sudden cardiac death and a personal history of VTAs (P = .036 and P = .001, respectively). Sustained monomorphic VT was the most common arrhythmia (n = 26, 70%) and was linked to decreased left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction and increased LV end-systolic and end-diastolic diameters. Antitachycardia pacing (ATP) successfully terminated 258 (79%) of the 326 VT events. Mortality rates were comparable between patients with and without VTAs (4 [11%] vs 29 [17%]; P = .42) and between those with and without ICDs (24 [16%] vs 85 [20%]; P = .367). CONCLUSION: VT rather than VF is the most common arrhythmia in patients with HCM; it is amenable to ATP and is associated with lower LV ejection fraction and higher LV diameters. Therefore, ATP-capable devices may be considered in HCM patients with these LV features.

Ventricular arrhythmias and cardiac arrest in atrial fibrillation patients with pacemakers and implantable cardioverter-defibrillators.

BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation (AF) has been linked to ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) and sudden death, but few studies have specifically explored this association. OBJECTIVE: We investigated whether AF is associated with an increased risk of ventricular tachycardia (VT), ventricular fibrillation (VF) and cardiac arrests (CA) in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs). METHODS: All patients with pacemakers and implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) hospitalised between 2010 and 2020 were identified from the French National database. Patients with a prior history of VT/VF/CA were excluded. RESULTS: 701,195 patients were identified initially. After excluding 55,688 patients, 581,781 (90.1%) and 63,726 (9.9%) remained in the pacemaker and ICD groups respectively. 248,046 (42.6%) pacemaker patients had AF and 333,735 (57.4%) had no AF, whereas in the ICD group 20,965 (32.9%) had AF and 42,761 (67.1%) had no AF. The incidence of VT/VF/CA was higher in AF patients compared to non-AF patients both in pacemaker (1.47%/year vs. 0.94%/year) and ICD (5.30%/year vs. 4.21%/year) groups. After multivariable analysis, AF was independently associated with an increased risk of VT/VF/CA in pacemaker (HR 1.236 [95% CI 1.198-1.276]) and ICD (HR 1.167 [95% CI 1.111-1.226]) patients. This risk was still significant in the 1:1 propensity score-matched analysis of the pacemaker (n = 200,977 per subgroup) and ICD cohorts (n = 18,349 per subgroup), HR 1.230 [95% CI 1.187-1.274] and HR 1.134 [95% CI 1.071-1.200] respectively and in the competing risk analysis (pacemaker: HR 1.195 (95% CI 1.154-1.238], ICD: HR 1.094 [95% CI 1.034-1.157]). CONCLUSION: CIED patients with AF have a higher risk of VT/VF/CA compared to CIED patients without AF.

Temporal Trends in Incidence and Survival From Sudden Cardiac Arrest Manifesting With Shockable and Nonshockable Rhythms: A 16-Year Prospective Study in a Large US Community.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: The proportion of nonshockable sudden cardiac arrests (pulseless electrical activity and asystole) continues to rise. Survival is lower than shockable (ventricular fibrillation [VF]) sudden cardiac arrests, but there is little community-based information on temporal trends in the incidence and survival from sudden cardiac arrests based on presenting rhythms. We investigated community-based temporal trends in sudden cardiac arrest incidence and survival by presenting rhythm. METHODS: We prospectively evaluated the incidence of each presenting sudden cardiac arrest rhythm and survival outcomes for out-of-hospital events in the Portland, Oregon metro area (population of approximately 1 million, 2002 to 2017). We limited inclusion to cases of likely cardiac cause with resuscitation attempted by emergency medical services. RESULTS: Out of 3,723 overall sudden cardiac arrest cases, 908 (24%) presented with pulseless electrical activity, 1,513 (41%) with VF, and 1,302 (35%) with asystole. The incidence of pulseless electrical activity-sudden cardiac arrest remained stable over 4-year periods (9.6/100,000 in 2002 to 2005, 7.4/100,000 in 2006 to 2009, 5.7/100,000 in 2010 to 2013, and 8.3/100,000 in 2014 to 2017; unadjusted beta [ß] -0.56; 95% confidence interval [CI], -3.98 to 2.85). The incidence of VF-sudden cardiac arrests decreased over time (14.6/100,000 in 2002 to 2005, 13.4/100,000 in 2006 to 2009, 12.0/100,000 in 2010 to 2013, and 11.6/100,000 in 2014 to 2017; unadjusted ß -1.05; 95% CI, -1.68 to -0.42) and asystole-sudden cardiac arrests (8.6/100,000 in 2002 to 2005, 9.0/100,000 in 2006 to 2009, 10.3/100,000 in 2010 to 2013, and 15.7/100,000 in 2014 to 2017; unadjusted ß 2.25; 95% CI -1.24 to 5.73) did not change significantly over time. Survival increased over time for pulseless electrical activity-sudden cardiac arrests (5.7%, 4.3%, 9.6%, 13.6%; unadjusted ß 2.8%; 95% CI 1.3 to 4.4) and VF-sudden cardiac arrests (27.5%, 29.8%, 37.9%, 36.6%; unadjusted ß 3.5%; 95% CI 1.4 to 5.6), but not for asystole-sudden cardiac arrests (1.7%, 1.6%, 4.0%, 2.4%; unadjusted ß 0.3%; 95% CI, -0.4 to 1.1). Enhancements in the emergency medical services system's pulseless electrical activity-sudden cardiac arrest management were temporally associated with the increasing pulseless electrical activity survival rates. CONCLUSIONS: Over a 16-year period, the incidence of VF/ventricular tachycardia decreased over time, but pulseless electrical activity incidence remained stable. Survival from both VF-sudden cardiac arrests and pulseless electrical activity-sudden cardiac arrests increased over time with a more than 2-fold increase for pulseless electrical activity-sudden cardiac arrests.

Impact of Neuroeffector Adrenergic Receptor Polymorphisms on Incident Ventricular Fibrillation During Acute Myocardial Ischemia.

Background Cardiac adrenergic receptor gene polymorphisms have the potential to influence risk of developing ventricular fibrillation (VF) during ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction, but no previous study has comprehensively investigated those most likely to alter norepinephrine release, signal transduction, or biased signaling. Methods and Results In a case-control study, we recruited 953 patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction without previous cardiac history, 477 with primary VF, and 476 controls without VF, and genotyped them for ADRB1 Arg389Gly and Ser49Gly, ADRB2 Gln27Glu and Gly16Arg, and ADRA2C Ins322-325Del. Within each minor allele-containing genotype, haplotype, or 2-genotype combination, patients with incident VF were compared with non-VF controls by odds ratios (OR) of variant frequencies referenced against major allele homozygotes. Of 156 investigated genetic constructs, 19 (12.2%) exhibited significantly (P<0.05) reduced association with incident VF, and none was associated with increased VF risk except for ADRB1 Gly389 homozygotes in the subset of patients not receiving ß-blockers. ADRB1 Gly49 carriers (prevalence 23.0%) had an OR (95% CI) of 0.70 (0.49-0.98), and the ADRA2C 322-325 deletion (Del) carriers (prevalence 13.5%) had an OR of 0.61 (0.39-0.94). When present in genotype combinations (8 each), both ADRB1 Gly49 carriers (OR, 0.67 [0.56-0.80]) and ADRA2C Del carriers (OR, 0.57 [0.45- 0.71]) were associated with reduced VF risk. Conclusions In ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction, the adrenergic receptor minor alleles ADRB1 Gly49, whose encoded receptor undergoes enhanced agonist-mediated internalization and ß-arrestin interactions leading to cardioprotective biased signaling, and ADRA2C Del322-325, whose receptor causes disinhibition of norepinephrine release, are associated with a lower incidence of VF. Registration URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT00859300.

Ventricular arrhythmias in arrhythmic mitral valve syndrome-a prospective continuous long-term cardiac monitoring study.

AIMS: Arrhythmic mitral valve syndrome is linked to life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias. The incidence, morphology and methods for risk stratification are not well known. This prospective study aimed to describe the incidence and the morphology of ventricular arrhythmia and propose risk stratification in patients with arrhythmic mitral valve syndrome. METHODS: Arrhythmic mitral valve syndrome patients were monitored for ventricular tachyarrhythmias by implantable loop recorders (ILR) and secondary preventive implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICD). Severe ventricular arrhythmias included ventricular fibrillation, appropriate or aborted ICD therapy, sustained ventricular tachycardia and non-sustained ventricular tachycardia with symptoms of hemodynamic instability. RESULTS: During 3.1 years of follow-up, severe ventricular arrhythmia was recorded in seven (12%) of 60 patients implanted with ILR [first event incidence rate 4% per person-year, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2-9] and in four (20%) of 20 patients with ICD (re-event incidence rate 8% per person-year, 95% CI 3-21). In the ILR group, severe ventricular arrhythmia was associated with frequent premature ventricular complexes, more non-sustained ventricular tachycardias, greater left ventricular diameter and greater posterolateral mitral annular disjunction distance (all P < 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: The yearly incidence of ventricular arrhythmia was high in arrhythmic mitral valve syndrome patients without previous severe arrhythmias using continuous heart rhythm monitoring. The incidence was even higher in patients with secondary preventive ICD. Frequent premature ventricular complexes, non-sustained ventricular tachycardias, greater left ventricular diameter and greater posterolateral mitral annular disjunction distance were predictors of first severe arrhythmic event.

Prognostic value of right ventricular refractory period heterogeneity in Type-1 Brugada electrocardiographic pattern.

AIMS: To investigate the prognostic significance of heterogeneity in the refractoriness of right ventricular (RV) outflow tract (RVOT) and RV apex at the electrophysiological study (EPS) in Brugada syndrome (BrS). METHODS AND RESULTS: A cohort of BrS patients (primary prevention) from five Italian centres was retrospectively analysed. Patients with spontaneous or drug-induced Type-1 electrocardiogram (ECG) + symptoms were offered an EPS for prognostic stratification. The primary endpoint was a composite of sudden cardiac death (SCD), resuscitated cardiac arrest, or appropriate intervention by the implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD). Three hundred and seventy-two patients with BrS were evaluated (44 ± 15 years, 69% males, 23% with ICD): 4 SCDs and 17 ICD interventions occurred at follow-up (median 48, interquartile range: 36-60 months). Family history of SCD, syncope, and a spontaneous Type-1 ECG pattern were univariate predictors of the primary endpoint in the whole population. In patients undergoing EPS (n = 198, 53%, 44 ± 12 years, 71% males, 39% with ICD), 3 SCD and 15 ICD interventions occurred at follow-up. In this subset, the primary endpoint was not only predicted by ventricular tachycardia/fibrillation inducibility but also by a difference in the refractory period between RVOT and RV apex (ΔRPRVOT-apex) >60 ms. ΔRPRVOT-apex > 60 ms remained an independent predictor of SCD/ICD shock at bivariate analysis, even when adjusted for the other univariate predictors, showing the highest predictive power at C-statistic analysis (0.75, 95% confidence interval 0.63-0.86). CONCLUSIONS: Heterogeneity of RV refractory periods is a strong, independent predictor of life-threatening arrhythmias in BrS patients, beyond VT/VF inducibility at EPS and common clinical predictors.

Ventricular fibrillation in acute myocardial infarction: 20-year trends in the FAST-MI study.

AIMS: Sudden cardiac arrest remains a major complication of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and is frequently related to ventricular fibrillation (VF). Incidence and impact of VF among patients hospitalized for AMI were evaluated. METHODS AND RESULTS: Data from the FAST-MI programme consisting of 5 French nationwide prospective cohort studies between 1995 and 2015 were analysed, totally including 14 423 patients with AMI (66 ± 14 years, 72% males, 59% ST-elevation myocardial infarction). Overall, proportion of patients presenting in-hospital VF decreased from 3.9% in 1995 to 1.8% in 2015 (P < 0.001). One-year mortality decreased from 60.7% to 24.6% (P < 0.001). However, compared with patients who did not develop VF, the over-risk of 1-year mortality associated with VF was stable over time [hazard ratio (HR) 6.78, 95% confidence interval (CI) 5.03-9.14 in 1995 and HR 6.64, 95% CI 4.20-10.49 in 2015, P = 0.52]. This increased mortality in the VF group was mainly related to fatal events occurring prior to hospital discharge, representing 86.2% of 1-year mortality, despite the very low rate of implantable cardioverter defibrillator in the VF group (2.6%). CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that in-hospital VF incidence and mortality in the setting of AMI have significantly decreased over the past 20 years. Nevertheless, VF remained steadily associated with approximately a 10-fold increased relative risk of in-hospital mortality, without an impact on post-discharge mortality. Beyond long-term cardiac defibrillation strategy, these results emphasize the need to identify in-hospital interventions to further reduce mortality in VF patients. STUDY REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00673036, NCT01237418, NCT02566200.

Prevalence of Mitral Annulus Disjunction and Mitral Valve Prolapse in Patients With Idiopathic Ventricular Fibrillation.

Background Idiopathic ventricular fibrillation (IVF) is diagnosed in patients with ventricular fibrillation of which the origin is not identified after extensive evaluations. Recent studies suggest an association between mitral annulus disjunction (MAD), mitral valve prolapse (MVP), and ventricular arrhythmias. The prevalence of MAD and MVP in patients with IVF in this regard is not well established. We aimed to explore the prevalence of MAD and MVP in a consecutive cohort of patients with IVF compared with matched controls. Methods and Results In this retrospective, multicenter cohort study, cardiac magnetic resonance images from patients with IVF (ie, negative for ischemia, cardiomyopathy, and channelopathies) and age- and sex-matched control subjects were analyzed for the presence of MAD (≥2 mm) and MVP (>2 mm). In total, 72 patients (mean age 39±14 years, 42% women) and 72 control subjects (mean age 41±11 years, 42% women) were included. MAD in the inferolateral wall was more prevalent in patients with IVF versus healthy controls (7 [11%] versus 1 [1%], P=0.024). MVP was only seen in patients with IVF and not in controls (5 [7%] versus 0 [0%], P=0.016). MAD was observed in both patients with (n=4) and without (n=3) MVP. Conclusions Inferolateral MAD and MVP were significantly more prevalent in patients with IVF compared with healthy controls. The authors advocate that evaluation of the mitral valve region deserves extra attention in the extensive screening of patients with unexplained cardiac arrest. These findings support further exploration of the pathophysiological mechanisms underlying a subset of IVF that associates with MAD and MVP.

Sex-Based Differences in Selected Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device Use: A 10-Year Statewide Patient Cohort.

Background Cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) include pacemakers, cardioverter defibrillators, and resynchronization therapy. This study aimed to assess CIED implantation and outcomes by sex and indication. Methods and Results This was a retrospective cohort study of adults with cardiovascular hospitalizations in New South Wales, Australia (2008 to 2018). CIED implantation in patients with arrhythmia, cardiomyopathy, and syncope were examined. Subcategories (complete heart block, atrial fibrillation/atrial flutter, ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation/cardiac arrest, sick sinus syndrome, and ischemic and nonischemic cardiomyopathy) were investigated. Primary outcome was implantation of CIEDs in men versus women adjusted for age and comorbidities. Secondary outcomes were trends over time, time to implant, length of stay, emergency status, and 30-day survival. Of 1 291 258 patients with cardiovascular admissions, 287 563 had arrhythmia, cardiomyopathy, or syncope and 29 080 (2.3%) received a CIED (22 472 pacemakers, 6808 defibrillators, 3207 resynchronization therapy). Women with arrhythmia, cardiomyopathy, or syncope were less likely to have pacemakers (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.78 [95% CI, 0.76-0.80]), defibrillators (aOR, 0.4, [95% CI, 0.40-0.45]) and resynchronization therapy (aOR, 0.66 [95% CI, 0.61-0.71]). Differences persisted across subcategories, including fewer pacemakers in complete heart block (aOR, 0.89 [95% CI, 0.80-0.98]) and syncope (aOR, 0.70 [95% CI, 0.63-0.79]); fewer defibrillators in ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation/cardiac arrest (aOR, 0.69 [95% CI, 0.61-0.77]); and less resynchronization therapy in cardiomyopathy (aOR, 0.62 [95% CI, 0.51-0.75]). Men and women receiving devices had higher 30-day survival compared with those who did not receive a device, and 30-day survival was similar between men and women receiving devices. Conclusions Lower CIED implantation was seen in women versus men, across nearly all indications, including complete heart block and ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation/cardiac arrest. The underuse of cardiac devices among women may arguably reflect a sex bias and requires further research.

Incidence, Characteristics, and Outcomes of Ventricular Fibrillation Complicating Acute Myocardial Infarction in Women Admitted Alive in the Hospital.

Background Little data are available in women presenting with ventricular fibrillation (VF) in the setting of acute myocardial infarction (AMI). We assessed frequency, predictors of VF, and outcomes, with a special focus on women compared with men. Methods and Results Data were analyzed from the FAST-MI (French Registry of Acute ST-Elevation or Non-ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction) program, which prospectively included 14 406 patients admitted to French cardiac intensive care units ≤48 hours from AMI onset between 1995 and 2015 (mean age, 66±14 years; 72% men; mean left ventricular ejection fraction, 52±12%; 59% with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction). A total of 359 patients developed VF during AMI, including 81 women (2.0% of 4091 women) and 278 men (2.7% of 10 315 men, P=0.02). ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction (odds ratio [OR], 2.29 [95% CI, 1.75-2.99]; P<0.001) was independently associated with the onset of VF during AMI. In contrast, female sex (OR, 0.73 [95% CI, 0.56-0.95]; P=0.02), hypertension (OR, 0.75 [95% CI, 0.60-0.94]; P=0.01), and prior myocardial infarction (OR, 0.69 [95% CI, 0.50-0.96]; P=0.03) were protective factors. Women were less likely to have cardiac intervention than men (percutaneous coronary intervention during hospitalization 48.1% versus 66.9%, respectively; P=0.04) with a higher 1-year mortality in women compared with men (50.6% versus 37.4%, respectively; P=0.03), including increased in-hospital mortality (42.0% versus 32.7%, respectively; P=0.12). After adjustment, female sex was no longer associated with a worse 1-year mortality (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.10 [95% CI, 0.75-1.61]; P=0.63). Conclusions Women have lower risk of developing VF during AMI compared with men. However, they are less likely to receive cardiac interventions than men, possibly contributing to missed opportunities of improved outcomes.

A Review of New-Onset Ventricular Arrhythmia after Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation.

INTRODUCTION: Heart failure (HF) is a severe and terminal stage of various heart diseases. Left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) are relatively mature and have contributed to the treatment of end-stage HF. Ventricular arrhythmia (VA) is a common complication after LVAD implantation, including ventricular tachycardia and ventricular fibrillation, both of which may cause abnormal circulation. METHODS: A literature search was conducted in the PubMed database, "Ventricular Arrhythmia" OR "VA" OR "Arrhythmia" OR "Ventricular Tachycardia," OR "Ventricular Fibrillation" AND "LVAD" OR "Left Ventricular Assist Device" OR "Heart Assist Device" as either keywords or MeSH terms, the authors screened the titles and abstracts of the articles. Eventually, 12 original research articles were retrieved. RESULTS: The 0.83 [95% CI: 0.77, 0.89] of patients were male. A whole of 53% [95% CI: 0.25, 0.81] of VA patients had a history of atrial fibrillation and 61% [95% CI: 0.52, 0.69] had a history of VA. 39% [95% CI: 0.29, 0.49] of the participants had no prior history of VA and experienced new VA following CF-LVAD implantation. Following CF-LVAD implantation, 59% [95% CI: 0.51, 0.67] of patients developed early VA (VA ≤30 days). The 30-day mortality rate of patients was 4% [95% CI: 0.01, 0.07]. And overall mortality was 28% [95% CI: 0.15, 0.41]. The reported incidence of VA after LVAD implantation is not identical in different medical centers and ranges from 20% to 60%. The mechanism of VA after LVAD implantation is summarized as primary cardiomyopathy-related, device mechanical stimulation, myocardial scarring, ventricular displacement, electrolyte regulation, and other processes. CONCLUSIONS: A preoperative VA history is considered a predictor of VA following LVAD implantation in most studies. Multiple mechanisms and factors, such as prevention of "suction events," ablation, and implantable cardioverter defibrillator, should be considered for the prevention and treatment of postoperative VA in patients requiring long-term VAD treatment. This study provides a reference for the clinical application of LAVD and the prevention of postoperative VA after LVAD implantation. Future multicenter prospective studies with uniform patient follow-up are needed to screen for additional potential risk factors and predictors. These studies will help to define the incidence rate of VA after LAVD implantation. As a result, we provide guidance for the selection of preventive intervention.

Prediction of Sudden Cardiac Death Manifesting With Documented Ventricular Fibrillation or Pulseless Ventricular Tachycardia.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to develop a novel clinical prediction algorithm for avertable sudden cardiac death. BACKGROUND: Sudden cardiac death manifests as ventricular fibrillation (VF)/ ventricular tachycardia (VT) potentially treatable with defibrillation, or nonshockable rhythms (pulseless electrical activity/asystole) with low likelihood of survival. There are no available clinical risk scores for targeted prediction of VF/VT. METHODS: Subjects with out-of-hospital sudden cardiac arrest presenting with documented VF or pulseless VT (33% of total cases) were ascertained prospectively from the Portland, Oregon, metro area with population ≈1 million residents (n = 1,374, 2002-2019). Comparisons of lifetime clinical records were conducted with a control group (n = 1,600) with ≈70% coronary disease prevalence. Prediction models were constructed from a training dataset using backwards stepwise logistic regression and applied to an internal validation dataset. Receiver operating characteristic curves (C statistic) were used to evaluate model discrimination. External validation was performed in a separate, geographically distinct population (Ventura County, California, population ≈850,000, 2015-2020). RESULTS: A clinical algorithm (VFRisk) constructed with 13 clinical, electrocardiogram, and echocardiographic variables had very good discrimination in the training dataset (C statistic = 0.808; [95% CI: 0.774-0.842]) and was successfully validated in internal (C statistic = 0.776 [95% CI: 0.725-0.827]) and external (C statistic = 0.782 [95% CI: 0.718-0.846]) datasets. The algorithm substantially outperformed the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤35% (C statistic = 0.638) and performed well across the LVEF spectrum. CONCLUSIONS: An algorithm for prediction of sudden cardiac arrest manifesting with VF/VT was successfully constructed using widely available clinical and noninvasive markers. These findings have potential to enhance primary prevention, especially in patients with mid-range or preserved LVEF.